From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lazare v. Pfizer, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1999
257 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

January 21, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.).


Plaintiff's action was terminated by the filing by an express stipulation of discontinuance executed by both parties ( Hotel Prince George Affiliates v. Grimbilas, 241 A.D.2d 302, lv dismissed 91 N.Y.2d 887; cf., Teitelbaum Holdings v. Gold, 48 N.Y.2d 51) and the scheduling of court conferences could not revive the previously terminated action ( see, Stellato v. Stellato, 230 A.D.2d 842, lv dismissed 89 N.Y.2d 982; Matter of Creamer, 37 A.D.2d 33, 36). Contrary to plaintiff's contention, we do not find the stipulation to be conditioned upon plaintiff amending his complaint in Federal court.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Tom and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Lazare v. Pfizer, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1999
257 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Lazare v. Pfizer, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALLAN J. LAZARE, Appellant, v. PFIZER, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1999

Citations

257 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
682 N.Y.S.2d 850

Citing Cases

Dumann Realty LLC v. Stareshefsky

Here, the parties entered into and filed a stipulation of discontinuance, which terminated the action. See…