From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stellato v. Stellato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 19, 1996
230 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

August 19, 1996


In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Connell, J.), entered June 26, 1995, as denied her motion pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 244, inter alia, for leave to enter a money judgment against the defendant in the principal sum of $80,861.51, representing arrears in pendente lite child support and maintenance, and (2) an order of the same court, entered December 4, 1995, as, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to the prior determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered June 26, 1995, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered December 4, 1995, made upon renewal and reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered December 4, 1995, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

Where the amount of arrears is shown to be due and unpaid, "[t]he court has no discretion to refuse to enter a judgment for arrears of support" ( Felton v Felton, 175 A.D.2d 794, 795). Here, the amount of arrears claimed by the plaintiff has not been shown to be due and unpaid. Rather, the record demonstrates that an issue of fact exists as to whether the required payments have been made. Thus, the record is insufficient to form a basis for an award of arrears, and a hearing would be required to determine whether the payments have been made prior to entering a money judgment ( see, Furey v Furey, 76 A.D.2d 915). However, since there is no longer an action pending due to the plaintiff's voluntary discontinuance of the action, the trial court is without jurisdiction to order such a hearing. Accordingly, the trial court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to enter a money judgment against the defendant for the alleged arrears.

In view of the above disposition, we need not reach the plaintiff's remaining contentions. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stellato v. Stellato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 19, 1996
230 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Stellato v. Stellato

Case Details

Full title:ANGELE STELLATO, Appellant, v. ROBERT STELLATO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 19, 1996

Citations

230 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 633

Citing Cases

Stellato v. Stellato

Decided February 13, 1997 Appeal from (2d Dept: 230 A.D.2d 842) FINALITY OF JUDGMENTS AND…

Napoli v. Napoli

amount of the arrears he owed, since there are valid disputes as to that amount. Accordingly, a hearing is…