Opinion
1:20-cv-01205-DAD JLT
08-10-2021
DONOVIN LAST, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. M-I, LLC, et al., Defendants.
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON THE MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (Doc. 25)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
After the parties failed to file a joint report, as required by Local Rule 251(c), related to the defendant's motion for a protective order, the Court dropped the motion from calendar (Doc. 24). A few hours later, the parties filed a stipulation to continue the hearing on the motion (Doc. 25). Thus, the Court ORDERS:
1. The stipulation to continue the defendant's motion for a protective order is DENIED as MOOT.
The motion may be re-filed. Though it SHALL be filed timely, it should not be filed until after the parties have exhausted their attempts to resolve the issues through the meet-and-confer process (Doc. 9 at 2-3).
IT IS SO ORDERED.