From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larkins v. Prenovost

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 5, 2017
Case No. CV 17-3294 DMG (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-3294 DMG (Ex)

07-05-2017

OSCAR LARKINS Plaintiff, v. THOMAS J. PRENOVOST JR., et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

On July 5, 2017, this Court having granted Defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Thomas J. Prenovost, Jr., and Prenovost, Noramandin, Bergh and Dawe, and against Plaintiff Oscar Larkins, and that this action is dismissed on the merits. DATED: July 5, 2017

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Larkins v. Prenovost

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 5, 2017
Case No. CV 17-3294 DMG (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2017)
Case details for

Larkins v. Prenovost

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR LARKINS Plaintiff, v. THOMAS J. PRENOVOST JR., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 5, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 17-3294 DMG (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2017)

Citing Cases

Stone v. United States

Plaintiff's Privacy Act allegations are thus dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6). See Larkins v. Prenovost, 2017 WL…

Delplanche v. Window Prods., Inc.

As its express terms indicate, the Act does not regulate the disclosure of records by private individuals or…