From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 9, 1989
550 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-2022.

November 9, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County; Raymond T. McNeal, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Laura Griffin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Defendant Joe Lane appeals his judgment and sentence which were imposed by the trial court after defendant pleaded guilty to violating his probation. In imposing sentence upon the defendant the trial court departed from the guidelines and from the permissive one cell bump-up range for probation violations and sentenced defendant to a term of five years imprisonment. This was error. Upon a violation of probation "a trial court may resentence the defendant to any term falling within the original guidelines range, including the one cell upward increase. However, no further increase or departure is permitted for any reason." Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851, 853 (Fla. 1989). See also Dewberry v. State, 546 So.2d 409 (Fla. 1989); State v. Tuthill, 545 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1989); Branton v. State, 548 So.2d 882 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accordingly, defendant's sentence must be vacated and this matter remanded for resentencing.

Judgment AFFIRMED; sentence VACATED; case REMANDED for resentencing.

SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lane v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 9, 1989
550 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Lane v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOE LANE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 9, 1989

Citations

550 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)