From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Eckert

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 7, 1995
652 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 93-00677.

April 7, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Daniel True Andrews, Judge.

Robert Lane, pro se.

Joseph G. Spicola, Jr. of Spicola Larkin, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.


Because the appellant failed to comply with the requirements of section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1991), the trial court properly dismissed his complaint. Since, however, the statute of limitations had not yet run at the time of dismissal, the appellant shall have the opportunity to file an amended complaint after compliance with the statute. Wright v. Polk County Public Health Unit, 601 So.2d 1318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Hamide v. State, Dep't of Corrections, 548 So.2d 877 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Wemett v. Duval County, 485 So.2d 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We therefore affirm the dismissal of the complaint and remand for further proceedings.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Lane v. Eckert

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 7, 1995
652 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Lane v. Eckert

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LANE, APPELLANT, v. JOYCE ECKERT, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 7, 1995

Citations

652 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Patterson v. Melman

Unlike waiver, the effect of a party's failure to fulfill a condition precedent is that the party still needs…

Mason v. Highlands Co.

Although the trial court was correct in dismissing appellant's complaint due to his failure to comply with…