From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landor v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 5, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-1329 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-1329

11-05-2012

DAMON LANDOR, Petitioner v. ERIC WILSON, et al., Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2012, upon consideration of the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 10), filed October 10, 2012, to which no objections were filed, and upon independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge's report is adopted.
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
3. The Clerk of Court shall close this file.
4. A certificate of appealability is denied.

______________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Landor v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 5, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-1329 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Landor v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:DAMON LANDOR, Petitioner v. ERIC WILSON, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 5, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-1329 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2012)

Citing Cases

Surine v. Thompson

Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78, 88 (1976); Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236, 242 (1976). Thus, inmates do not…

Reynolds v. Rickard

Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78, 88 (1976); Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236, 242 (1976). Thus, inmates do not…