From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lancaster v. Kane

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 30, 2008
No. CIV S-06-1008 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1008 LKK GGH P.

May 30, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges the 2004 decision by the California Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) finding him unsuitable for parole. On May 16, 2008, the Ninth Circuit granted rehearing en banc inHayward v. Marshall, 512 F.3d 536 (9th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days of the date of this order, the parties shall show cause why this action should not be administratively stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's decision in Hayward v. Marshall, 512 F.3d 536 (9th Cir. 2008), reh'g en banc granted, ___ F.3d ___, No. 06-55392 (9th Cir. filed May 16, 2008).


Summaries of

Lancaster v. Kane

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 30, 2008
No. CIV S-06-1008 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Lancaster v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EUGENE LANCASTER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN KANE, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1008 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2008)