From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamb v. Moody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2009
62 A.D.3d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-04443.

May 19, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for fraudulent conveyance of real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.H.O.), entered March 20, 2008, which denied their unopposed motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a judgment against the defendant William Dennis Moody upon his default in appearing or answering.

Roemer Wallens Mineaux, LLP, Albany, N.Y. (Robert P. Mascali of counsel), for appellant. William Dennis Moody, Elmsford, N.Y., respondent pro se.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Miller, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the respondent upon his failure to appear or to answer the complaint, the plaintiffs failed to proffer either an affidavit of the facts or a complaint verified by a party with personal knowledge of the facts as required by CPLR 3215 (f) ( see Peniston v Epstein, 10 AD3d 450; DeVivo v Sparago, 287 AD2d 535, 536; Fiorino v Yung Poon Yung, 281 AD2d 513). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion.


Summaries of

Lamb v. Moody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 19, 2009
62 A.D.3d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Lamb v. Moody

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA LAMB et al., Appellants, v. WILLIAM A. MOODY, JR., Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 19, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4029
878 N.Y.S.2d 635

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Edeman

Without an affidavit by the plaintiff regarding the facts constituting the claim and amounts due or, in the…