From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LAMARCA v. GREAT ATL. PAC. TEA CO., INC.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
Jul 3, 2007
16 Misc. 3d 1115 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)

Summary

finding defendant's course of conduct in not paying overtime main issue and that individuality of workers' damages does not defeat class certification

Summary of this case from Thomas v. Meyers Assocs., L.P.

Opinion

No. 601973/04.

July 3, 2007.


Actions — Class Actions. Civil Practice Law and Rules — § 901 (Prerequisites to class action).


Summaries of

LAMARCA v. GREAT ATL. PAC. TEA CO., INC.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
Jul 3, 2007
16 Misc. 3d 1115 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)

finding defendant's course of conduct in not paying overtime main issue and that individuality of workers' damages does not defeat class certification

Summary of this case from Thomas v. Meyers Assocs., L.P.

finding defendant's course of conduct in not paying overtime main issue, and that individuality of workers' damages does not defeat class certification

Summary of this case from Thomas v. Meyers Assocs., L.P.
Case details for

LAMARCA v. GREAT ATL. PAC. TEA CO., INC.

Case Details

Full title:Benedetto Lamarca, Dolores Guiddy, and Stephen Tedesco, Individually, and…

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County

Date published: Jul 3, 2007

Citations

16 Misc. 3d 1115 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 51424

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Meyers Assocs., L.P.

The potential for different individual damages claims is not a valid reason for denying class action status.…

Tokhtaman v. Human Care, LLC

At the outset, defendants' contention that plaintiff is precluded from seeking class certification and that…