From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lakeland Industries, Inc. v. Yang Bing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2005
23 A.D.3d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-07096.

November 21, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and conversion, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated June 24, 2004, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate a judgment entered May 3, 2001, upon their default in appearing or answering the complaint.

Goldberg Dubin, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stacey Van Malden of counsel), for appellants.

Robert L. Folks Associates, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Cynthia A. Kouril of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Florio, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A party attempting to vacate a default judgment must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense ( see Graham v. Cohen, 309 AD2d 897). The defendants failed to satisfy either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion.

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Lakeland Industries, Inc. v. Yang Bing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2005
23 A.D.3d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Lakeland Industries, Inc. v. Yang Bing

Case Details

Full title:LAKELAND INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Respondents, v. YANG BING et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2005

Citations

23 A.D.3d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8959
804 N.Y.S.2d 253

Citing Cases

Steinberg v. Disalvo

This is a two-pronged test in which the party opposing default judgment must satisfy both elements. (see,…