From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 2003
309 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-09651

Submitted September 24, 2003,

October 27, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), entered August 20, 2002, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) to vacate a judgment entered upon his default in appearing at trial.

Joseph C. Angelo, Bayside, N.Y., for appellant.

Bronstein Gewirtz Grossman, LLC, New York, N.Y. (Neil Grossman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA L. TOWNES, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A defendant attempting to vacate a default judgment must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense ( see Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568; Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333). The defendant failed to satisfy either requirement.

FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO, TOWNES and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Graham v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 2003
309 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Graham v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE GRAHAM, respondent, v. SHALOM COHEN, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 27, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 382

Citing Cases

Lakeland Industries, Inc. v. Yang Bing

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. A party attempting to vacate a default judgment must…