From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lackowitz v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 2006
29 A.D.3d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-09195.

May 16, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered September 2, 2005, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 4102 (e) for leave to file a late jury demand.

Frank J. Rubino, Corporation Counsel, Yonkers, N.Y. (Michael Levinson of counsel), for appellant.

Lawrence Lewis, South Salem, N.Y. (Annette G. Hasapidis of counsel; Anne Minihan on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff served a note of issue which did not request a jury trial. The defendant did not thereafter timely request a jury trial, and thus, waived its right to a jury trial ( see CPLR 4102 [a]). About seven months after being served with the note of issue, the defendant moved for leave to serve and file a demand for a jury trial. The Supreme Court providently denied the defendant's motion. The defendant's excuse that counsel inadvertently failed to notice that the plaintiff's note of issue did not request a jury trial was inadequate ( see Fertik v. Fertik, 264 AD2d 463, 464).


Summaries of

Lackowitz v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 2006
29 A.D.3d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Lackowitz v. City of Yonkers

Case Details

Full title:RACHEL LACKOWITZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF YONKERS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3850
813 N.Y.S.2d 912

Citing Cases

Ramirez-Hernandez v. Bloomingdale

The Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed the trial court because it "improvidently exercised its…

Gensch v. Interligi

Instead, defendant waited more than 60 days to file her demand for a jury trial. Therefore, defendant waived…