From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kyles v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Mar 2, 2022
No. 09-21-00226-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 2, 2022)

Opinion

09-21-00226-CR

03-02-2022

REGINALD CARVIN KYLES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


Do Not Publish

Submitted on February 18, 2022

On Appeal from the 356th District Court Hardin County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25280

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

W. SCOTT GOLEMON CHIEF JUSTICE

In an open plea, appellant Reginal Carvin Kyles pleaded guilty to murder. After conducting a sentencing hearing, the trial court assessed Kyles's punishment at life in prison.

Kyles's appellate counsel filed an Anders brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes that the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On November 15, 2021, we granted an extension of time for Kyles to file a pro se brief. We received no response from Kyles.

We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support the appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment.

Kyles may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kyles v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Mar 2, 2022
No. 09-21-00226-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Kyles v. State

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD CARVIN KYLES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

No. 09-21-00226-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 2, 2022)