From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kumar v. Lowe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 9, 2018
Civil No. 3:17-cv-1421 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 9, 2018)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:17-cv-1421

07-09-2018

MUKESH KUMAR, Petitioner v. CRAIG A. LOWE, WARDEN, Respondent


() MEMORANDUM

I. Background

On August 11, 2017, Petitioner Mukesh Kumar, a native and citizen of India, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his continued detention by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"), and seeking an individualized bond hearing or immediate release under an order of supervision. (Doc. 1) (citing Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) (establishing a six-month presumptively reasonable period permitted to effectuate an alien's deportation following a final order of removal)). At the time his petition was filed, Petitioner was detained at the Pike County Correctional Facility, in Lords Valley, Pennsylvania. (Doc. 1).

On July 9, 2018, Respondent filed a suggestion of mootness stating that Petitioner was removed from the United States on February 12, 2018. (Doc. 7; Doc. 7-1, Warrant of Removal/ Deportation). Respondent argues that the habeas petition is therefore moot. (Doc. 7, pp. 2-3) (citing Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) ("If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff's personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.")). In an effort to ascertain the custodial status of Petitioner, the Court accessed the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Online Detainee Locator System, which revealed that Petitioner is no longer in the custody of that agency. For the reasons set forth below, the habeas petition will be dismissed as moot.

Upon entering Petitioner's alien registration number, 208933964, and his country of birth, India, into the Online Detainee Locator System, https://locator.ice.gov/odls/homePage.do, the results returned no matches for any such detainee. --------

II. Discussion

Article III of the Constitution dictates that a federal court may adjudicate "only actual, ongoing cases or controversies." Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990); Burkey v. Marberry, 556 F.3d 142, 147 (3d Cir. 2009). "[A] petition for habeas corpus relief generally becomes moot when a prisoner is released from custody before the court has addressed the merits of the petition." Diaz-Cabrera v. Sabol, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124195, *3 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (quoting Lane v. Williams, 455 U.S. 624, 631 (1982)). Thus, when a petitioner, who challenges only his ICE detention pending removal and not the validity of the removal order itself, is deported, the petition becomes moot because the petitioner has achieved the relief sought. See Tahic v. Holder, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49782, *3-4 (M.D. Pa. 2011); Nguijol v. Mukasey, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95464, *1-2 (M.D. Pa. 2008) (dismissing the habeas petition as moot).

In the present case, the habeas petition challenges Petitioner's continued detention pending removal. See (Doc. 1). Because Petitioner has since been released from ICE custody and removed from the United States, the petition no longer presents an existing case or controversy. See Diaz-Cabrera, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124195 at *2-4. Further, Petitioner has received the habeas relief he sought, namely, to be released from ICE custody. See Sanchez v. AG, 146 Fed. Appx. 547, 549 (3d Cir. 2005) (holding that the habeas petition challenging the petitioner's continued detention by ICE was rendered moot once the petitioner was released). Accordingly, the instant habeas corpus petition will be dismissed as moot.

A separate Order shall issue. Date: July 9, 2018

/s/_________

Robert D. Mariani

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kumar v. Lowe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 9, 2018
Civil No. 3:17-cv-1421 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Kumar v. Lowe

Case Details

Full title:MUKESH KUMAR, Petitioner v. CRAIG A. LOWE, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 9, 2018

Citations

Civil No. 3:17-cv-1421 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 9, 2018)