From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kuletsky v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 28, 2007
41 A.D.3d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 501545.

June 28, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Michael Kuletsky, Woodbourne, petitioner pro se.

Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Andrea Oser of counsel), for respondent.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ.


Petitioner was found guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules following a tier III disciplinary hearing. On administrative appeal, three of the charges were dismissed, leaving only that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of possessing contraband. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination. The Attorney General has advised that the determination has since been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Given that petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Adams v Goord, 32 AD3d 644, 645).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Kuletsky v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 28, 2007
41 A.D.3d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Kuletsky v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL KULETSKY, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5614
837 N.Y.S.2d 598

Citing Cases

Lebron v. Artus

Initially, as the Attorney General advised this Court, during the pendency of this proceeding, the October…