From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 10, 2006
32 A.D.3d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

99528.

August 10, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Omar Adams, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Crew III, J.P, Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit possession of contraband and disobeying a direct order. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Carroll v Goord, 24 AD3d 845).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Adams v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 10, 2006
32 A.D.3d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Adams v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of OMAR ADAMS, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 10, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6189
818 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

Rudert v. Goord

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination of guilt has been administratively…

Kuletsky v. Selsky

The Attorney General has advised that the determination has since been administratively reversed and all…