From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kreisher v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Dec 23, 2013
2:12-cv-00530 DAD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)

Opinion

          BESS M. BREWER, Attorney for Plaintiff.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, DONNA L. CALVERT, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration, ANNABELLE J. YANG, Special Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff's previously filed Motion for Equal Access to Justice Act Fees is hereby withdrawn.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff will be awarded attorney fees in the amount of five-thousand, nine-hundred dollars ($5, 900.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and zero dollars ($0.00) in costs under Taxation of Costs, 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d), 1920.

         After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the Defendant will consider any assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's counsel, Bess M. Brewer. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010), the ability to honor any such assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the Defendant will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

         Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to be made directly to Bess M. Brewer, pursuant to any assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

         This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

          ORDER

         The parties' stipulation is APPROVED AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kreisher v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Dec 23, 2013
2:12-cv-00530 DAD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Kreisher v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA KREISHER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN[1], Acting Commissioner…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-00530 DAD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2013)