Opinion
1:21-cv-01706-JLT-SAB
06-21-2022
MICHAEL KRAUSE, Petitioner, v. TARA KRAUSE, Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND CONTEMPT SANCTIONS
(DOCS. 41.69)
The assigned magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations that Petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order and contempt sanctions (Doc. 41) be denied. (Doc. 69.) The magistrate judge found that because a concurrent order granted the primary requested relief sought by Petitioner when he filed the motion for a temporary restraining order, a temporary restraining order was unnecessary to preserve the status quo and to prevent irreparable harm to the Petitioner. (Id. at 12.) The magistrate judge also found that, to the extent a recommendation was required to deny the requested contempt sanctions, such request for certification of a finding of contempt should be denied. (Id. at 11.) The findings and recommendations notified all parties that they may file objections within 14 days. (Id. at 3.) No objections were filed by either party within the period to do so.
The motion was entered on the docket as a memorandum. (Doc. 41.)
According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
1. The findings and recommendations issued on May 20, 2022 (Doc. 69) are ADOPTED in full.
2. Petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order and finding of contempt (Doc. 41) is DENIED.
3. This matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.