Opinion
Argued June 20, 1889
Decided June 28, 1889
A.J. Dittenhoefer for appellant.
S.W. Rosendale for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion of court below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.
Argued June 20, 1889
Decided June 28, 1889
A.J. Dittenhoefer for appellant.
S.W. Rosendale for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion of court below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.
Full title:WILLIAM KRAMER, Appellant, v . GUSTAV AMBERG, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 28, 1889
Here, the landlord does not exercise any option to terminate the lease; the lease is simply terminated once…
Saad v. HatfieldConstruing the lease as of the date of its execution, it is quite obvious that the sale of intoxicating…