From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koehl v. Greene

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Dec 11, 2006
9:06-CV-0478 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 2006)

Opinion

9:06-CV-0478 (LEK/GHL).

December 11, 2006

EDWARD KOEHL, 94-A-2890, Plaintiff, Pro Se, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Comstock, NY.

HON. ELIOT L. SPITZER, Attorney General for the State of New York, Counsel for Defendants, MICHAEL G. McCARTIN, ESQ., STEPHEN M. KERWIN, ESQ., Assistant Attorneys General, The Capitol, Albany, NY.


DECISION and ORDER


Currently before the Court is an Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Edward Koehl ("Plaintiff"). (Dkt. No. 16.) In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff names, and asserts factual allegations against, a new Defendant, "Julie Daniel." ( Id. at 1, 2.)

Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally governs the amendment of complaints; however, in the case of proposed amendments that seek to add new defendants, the Court must look also to Rule 21. U.S. v. Chilstead Building Co., 96-CV-0641, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18134, at *2 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 1997) (McAvoy, C.J.) (citations omitted). Rule 21 states that a party may be added to an action "at any stage of the action and on such terms as are just." Fed.R.Civ.P. 21; Chilstead, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18134, at *2. Addition of parties under Rule 21 is guided by the same liberal standard as a motion to amend under Rule 15. Chilstead, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18134, at *2; Fair Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v. Burke, 55 F.R.D. 414, 419 (E.D.N.Y. 1972).

Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that leave to amend "shall be freely given when justice so requires." Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962); Manson v. Stacescu, 11 F.3d 1127, 1133 (2d Cir. 1993).

In this action, Defendants have not yet filed an Answer to Plaintiff's original Complaint. As a result, Plaintiff has a right to file his Amended Complaint naming "Julie Daniel" as a new Defendant "as a matter of course," i.e., without first obtaining leave of the Court.

ACCORDINGLY, it is

ORDERED that the Clerk amend the Court's docket to reflect the caption and parties as listed on the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 16); and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff provide the Court with copies of his Amended Complaint and completed USM-285 forms for service on Defendants; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk issue any summonses necessary and forward them, along with copies of the Amended Complaint, to the United States Marshal for service upon Defendants; and it is further

ORDERED that a response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint be filed by Defendants or their counsel as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Koehl v. Greene

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Dec 11, 2006
9:06-CV-0478 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 2006)
Case details for

Koehl v. Greene

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD KOEHL, Plaintiff, v. GARY GREENE, Superintendent, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Dec 11, 2006

Citations

9:06-CV-0478 (LEK/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 2006)