From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kodiak Prods. Co. v. Deegear

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 28, 2015
NO. 02-13-00422-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00422-CV

08-28-2015

KODIAK PRODUCTS CO., INC. APPELLANT v. CHARLES H. DEEGEAR, JR. AND DEEMAXX COMPONENTS, INC. APPELLEES


FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 236-252084-11
MEMORANDUM OPINIONAND JUDGMENT

We have considered the parties' first amended agreed motion for remand for rendition of judgment pursuant to rule of appellate procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B). See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). It is the court's opinion that the motion should be and is granted. Accordingly, we withdraw our judgment dated June 4, 2015, set aside the trial court's September 12, 2013 "Second Amended Final Judgment" without regard to the merits, and remand this case to the trial court to render judgment by signing the parties' "Agreed Final Judgment" in the form attached as Exhibit A to the parties' first amended agreed motion for remand for rendition of judgment. See id.

In accordance with the parties' agreement, costs of this appeal shall be paid by the party incurring same, see Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), and mandate shall be issued immediately, see Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c).

"Appellees' Motion for Rehearing" and "Appellant Kodiak Products Co., Inc.'s Motion for Rehearing" are denied as moot.

/s/ Anne Gardner

ANNE GARDNER

JUSTICE
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. DELIVERED: August 28, 2015

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Kodiak Prods. Co. v. Deegear

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 28, 2015
NO. 02-13-00422-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Kodiak Prods. Co. v. Deegear

Case Details

Full title:KODIAK PRODUCTS CO., INC. APPELLANT v. CHARLES H. DEEGEAR, JR. AND DEEMAXX…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Aug 28, 2015

Citations

NO. 02-13-00422-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2015)

Citing Cases

SSCP Mgmt. v. Sutherland/Palumbo, LLC

Texas does not appear to recognize a common law claim for false advertising, Kodiak Products Co., Inc. v.…

SSCP Mgmt. v. Sutherland/Palumbo, LLC

Sutherland failed, however, to make a prima facie case for this claim. Texas does not appear to recognize a…