From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Mar 17, 1997
942 S.W.2d 624 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)

Summary

recognizing that certain orders while a defendant is on deferred adjudication community supervision may be appealed

Summary of this case from Su Thanh Nguyen v. State

Opinion

Nos. 1553-96, 1554-96.

January 29, 1997. Opinion Ordered Published March 17, 1997.

Appeal from the 291st District Court, Dallas County, Gerry Meier, J.

Kerry P. Fitzgerald, Dallas, for appellant.

John Vance, District Attorney, Dallas, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.

Before the court en banc.


OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


The trial court accepted Appellant's pleas of nolo contendere to two offenses of delivery of cocaine, found sufficient evidence to support the pleas, deferred a finding of guilt, and placed Appellant on ten years' deferred adjudication probation. The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. Kirk v. State, Nos. 05-92-01806- CR 05-92-01807-CR (Tex.App. — Dallas, delivered September 5, 1996).

On appeal, Appellant raised three points of error. The Court of Appeals held it was without jurisdiction to hear the appeals because Appellant did not appeal a ruling on a pretrial motion or have the trial court's permission to appeal. The Court of Appeals cited our opinion in Dillehey v. State, 815 S.W.2d 623 (Tex.Cr.App. 1991), for the proposition that Article 44.01(j), V.A.C.C.P. grants unadjudicated defendants a limited right to appeal only rulings on pretrial motions. Dillehey, however, did not hold that unadjudicated defendants were limited in what they could appeal, only that they could appeal under Article 44.02, V.A.C.C.P. Dillehey entered into a negotiated plea of guilty; therefore, under the proviso to Art. 44.02, he was limited to appealing with the trial court's permission or to rulings on pretrial motions. However, since Appellant entered his pleas without a plea bargain, the Rule 40(b)(1) restrictions on appeals of negotiated pleas do not apply. The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to entertain Appellant's appeal.

The proviso was repealed with the enactment of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. The procedures for a defendant appealing from a negotiated plea of guilty are now governed by Tex.R.App.Pro. 40(b)(1).

Accordingly, we grant Appellant's petition, vacate the Court of Appeals' order dismissing Appellant's appeal, and remand the cause to that court to consider Appellant's appeal.


Summaries of

Kirk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Mar 17, 1997
942 S.W.2d 624 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)

recognizing that certain orders while a defendant is on deferred adjudication community supervision may be appealed

Summary of this case from Su Thanh Nguyen v. State

recognizing that certain orders while a defendant is on deferred adjudication community supervision may be appealed

Summary of this case from Lake-Crunk v. State

recognizing that certain orders while a defendant is on deferred adjudication community supervision may be appealed

Summary of this case from Beal v. State

discussing Dillehey and the statutory predecessor to TEX.R.APP.P. 40(b)

Summary of this case from Smith v. State

interpreting article 44.01(j) of code of criminal procedure to allow unadjudicated defendants who plead guilty pursuant to negotiated plea bargain to appeal with trial court's permission or rulings on pretrial motions

Summary of this case from Smith v. State
Case details for

Kirk v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marvin Leroy KIRK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Mar 17, 1997

Citations

942 S.W.2d 624 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Woods v. State

Furthermore, Rule 25.2(b)(3)'s notice provisions apply to defendants who are placed on deferred adjudication…

Smith v. State

CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 44.01(j) (Vernon Supp. 1997)). The amendment also gave defendants on deferred…