From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinoy v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jul 25, 1967
232 A.2d 91 (D.C. 1967)

Opinion

No. 4186.

Argued June 21, 1967.

Decided July 25, 1967.

APPEAL FROM DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS; HAROLD H. GREENE, CHIEF JUDGE.

Anthony G. Amsterdam, Washington, D.C., and Morton Stavis, Newark, N.J., with whom Philip J. Hirschkop, Alexandria, Va., was on the brief, for appellant.

Louis Lusky and others filed a brief as amici curiae urging reversal.

Ted D. Kuemmerling, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Charles T. Duncan, Corp. Counsel, Hubert B. Pair, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before HOOD, Chief Judge, MYERS, Associate Judge, and QUINN (Associate Judge, Retired).


Having considered the various points raised by appellant, we are of the opinion that the facts of the case are adequately discussed and the law correctly analyzed and applied in the well reasoned opinion of Judge (now Chief Judge) Greene denying the motion in arrest of judgment.

See also United States v. Woodard, 376 F.2d 136 (7th Cir. 1967), affirming convictions for disorderly conduct during hearings by the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kinoy v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jul 25, 1967
232 A.2d 91 (D.C. 1967)
Case details for

Kinoy v. District of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:Arthur KINOY, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 25, 1967

Citations

232 A.2d 91 (D.C. 1967)