From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Food

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 20, 2009
352 F. App'x 858 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-2116.

Submitted: November 17, 2009.

Decided: November 20, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00487-JBF-FBS).

Darrin L. King, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Westcott Smith, Kaufman Canoles, PC, Williamsburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Darrin King appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Appellee on King's claim of disability discrimination. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. Rule 34(b). King's brief fails to challenge the district court's dispositive conclusions that he failed to demonstrate a prima facie case of discrimination and that the Appellee had legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for not hiring King. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order and deny King's motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

King v. Food

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 20, 2009
352 F. App'x 858 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

King v. Food

Case Details

Full title:Darrin L. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMITHFIELD FOOD, Defendant-Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 20, 2009

Citations

352 F. App'x 858 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

McKnight v. United Airlines, Inc.

No case cited by United addresses GIPA (or even GINA) at all, and each one deals with facts presented at…