From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimble v. Hino Motors Mfg. USA, Inc.

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II
May 30, 2012
2012 Ark. App. 376 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. CA11-859

05-30-2012

TOMMY R. KIMBLE APPELLANT v. HINO MOTORS MFG. USA, INC., TOKIO MARINE MGMT., and DEATH & PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY FUND APPELLEES


APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

COMMISSION

[NO. F801104]


REMANDED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL

ADDENDUM


WAYMOND M. BROWN , Judge

Appellant Tommy Kimble appeals the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission's decision, finding that he failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he suffered a compensable heart attack while working for appellee Hino Motors. Kimble argues on appeal that the Commission's decision is not supported by the evidence. We are unable to reach the merits of Kimble's arguments at this time due to deficiencies in his addendum.

This is the second time this case is before us. We initially ordered rebriefing due to deficiencies in Kimble's brief and addendum. See Kimble v. Hino Motors Mfg. USA, Inc., 2012 Ark. App. 178.

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires that the order or opinion challenged on appeal be included in the addendum. The rule also states that any document essential for this court to confirm jurisdiction must also be included in the addendum. Here, Kimble has failed to provide the Commission's opinion, as well as the notice of appeal from that opinion, in his addendum. Kimble has seven days to file a supplemental addendum. We strongly encourage appellate counsel, prior to filing the supplemental addendum, to review our rules as well as the record and addenda to ensure that no additional deficiencies are present.

(2011).

Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(4). See In re 4-2(b)(4) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, 2011 Ark. 141.
--------

Remanded for supplemental addendum.

VAUGHT, C.J., and MARTIN, J., agree.


Summaries of

Kimble v. Hino Motors Mfg. USA, Inc.

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II
May 30, 2012
2012 Ark. App. 376 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Kimble v. Hino Motors Mfg. USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY R. KIMBLE APPELLANT v. HINO MOTORS MFG. USA, INC., TOKIO MARINE…

Court:ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

2012 Ark. App. 376 (Ark. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Kimble v. Hino Motors Mfg. USA, Inc.

In Kimble v. Hino Motors Mfg. USA, Inc., 2012 Ark. App. 178, we ordered rebriefing due to deficiencies in…