From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re 4-2(B) of the Rules of the Supreme Court

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Mar 31, 2011
2011 Ark. 141 (Ark. 2011)

Opinion

Opinion Delivered March 31, 2011


The Civil Practice Committee recommended a new paragraph (b)(4) to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2, to give the appellate court an alternative method to handle a defective abstract or addendum.

We thank the Civil Practice Committee for its work.

We adopt the amendment to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(b), as set out below, and republish this rule. This amendment is effective immediately.

Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals

Rule 4-2. Contents of briefs.

. . .

(b) Insufficiency of appellant's abstract or addendum. Motions to dismiss the appeal for insufficiency of appellant's abstract or addendum will not be recognized. Deficiencies in the appellant's abstract or addendum will ordinarily come to the court's attention and be handled in one of four ways as follows:

. . .

(4) If the appellate court determines that deficiencies or omissions in the abstract or addendum need to be corrected, but complete rebriefing is not needed, then the court will order the appellant to file a supplemental abstract or addendum within seven calendar days to provide the additional materials from the record to the members of the appellate court.


Summaries of

In re 4-2(B) of the Rules of the Supreme Court

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Mar 31, 2011
2011 Ark. 141 (Ark. 2011)
Case details for

In re 4-2(B) of the Rules of the Supreme Court

Case Details

Full title:IN RE 4-2(b) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 31, 2011

Citations

2011 Ark. 141 (Ark. 2011)

Citing Cases

Morris v. Weaver

Petitioner has not sought to supplement his brief with an abstract of the pretrial hearing, and we now direct…

Williams v. State

Because appellant has not included the jury-verdict forms in his addendum, we order him to correct this…