From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. New York State Health Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 1999
262 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 15, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.).


A default judgment was properly denied as against the individual defendants because, among other reasons, they were never personally served with process in accordance with CPLR 307 ( see, Matter of Spodek v. New York State Commr. of Taxation Fin., 85 N.Y.2d 760, 766; Dreger v. New York State Thruway Auth., 81 N.Y.2d 721, 724), and the materials plaintiff seeks may be confidential under Public Health Law § 230 (9), (10) and (11) and § 2805-m ( see, Atkins v. Guest, 201 A.D.2d 411). We would also note that the individual defendants do not personally possess the agency defendant's records in issue, and that plaintiff's dispute appears to be with the agency, which answered in timely fashion,

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Tom, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.


Summaries of

Kim v. New York State Health Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 1999
262 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Kim v. New York State Health Department

Case Details

Full title:YOON KIM, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 499

Citing Cases

Trowbridge v. City Univ. of N.Y.

Here, the affidavits of service indicate only that the Amended Complaint was served on the Attorney General…

Arons v. State of New York

Id. Thus, service on the Attorney General is insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over the State in a…