From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 2008
56 A.D.3d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4475.

November 6, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered January 16, 2008, which, in an action for medical malpractice, granted defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint to the extent of ordering a traverse hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

McAloon Friedman, P.C., New York (Timothy J. O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for appellant.

DeSimone, Aviles, Shorter Oxamendi LLP, New York (Louise M. Cherkis of counsel), for respondents.

Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Gonzalez, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.


A traverse hearing was properly ordered in light of the conflicting accounts provided by plaintiffs process server, and defendant and his office manager, regarding how and whether service was properly effectuated upon defendant ( see Ananda Capital Partners v Stav Elec. Sys. [1994], 301 AD2d 430).


Summaries of

Kim v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 6, 2008
56 A.D.3d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Kim v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:KELLY KIM et al., Respondents, v. SYDNEY R. COLEMAN, M.D., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 6, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8407
866 N.Y.S.2d 570

Citing Cases

Statuto v. Schuhmann's Inn, Inc.

In view of the conflicting affidavits herein, and the strong public policy in favor of resolving cases on…