From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keys v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2022
2:22-cv-1106 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1106 CKD P

06-29-2022

ZED LEVI KEYS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner has submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. It appears that petitioner is serving a term of probation imposed in the Superior Court of Lassen County. In a § 2254 action, the appropriate respondent is the state officer that has custody of the petitioner. Rule 2(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The United States of America is not a proper respondent.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed; and
2. Petitioner is granted 14 days to submit an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 which names the proper respondent which appears to be petitioner's
Lassen County probation officer.
3. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

With his amended petition, petitioner need not submit the state court record as he did with his original petition. If the court requires any state court records, they will be provided by the appropriate respondent. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.


Summaries of

Keys v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2022
2:22-cv-1106 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Keys v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ZED LEVI KEYS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-1106 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)