From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. Bywater

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 26, 1969
171 N.W.2d 58 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

Docket No. 5,744.

Decided June 26, 1969. Application for leave to appeal filed November 18, 1969.

Appeal from Oakland, Philip Pratt, J. Submitted Division 2 April 8, 1969, at Lansing. (Docket No. 5,744.) Decided June 26, 1969. Application for leave to appeal filed November 18, 1969.

Complaint by Warren Michael Kelly, Mary Jayne Kelly, and Timothy Kelly, a minor, by his next friend Mary Jayne Kelly, against George Bywater for injuries to Timothy Kelly resulting from an automobile accident. Verdict and judgment of no cause of action. Plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

Nern Alfs, for plaintiffs.

Sauer Girard, for defendant.

Before: GILLIS, P.J., and LEVIN and BRONSON, JJ.


On August 12, 1956, plaintiff Timothy Kelly, then eight and one-half years of age, was a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by defendant. Plaintiff was injured when defendant's car went out of control and overturned. Plaintiff sued to recover for the injuries sustained and now appeals from a judgment following a jury verdict of no cause of action.

Plaintiff initially contends that the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury concerning whether or not plaintiff was a guest passenger within the meaning of Michigan's guest passenger statute.

CLS 1961, § 257.401 (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 9.2101).

Plaintiff requested that the following instruction be given:

"The law presumes that a child between the ages of 7 and 14 does not possess sufficient ability, intelligence or experience to become a `guest' under the guest passenger act."

The trial court refused to give the requested instruction. The statement of law in plaintiff's requested instruction was incorrect and the instruction as given was proper. Burhans v. Witbeck (1965), 375 Mich. 253.

Plaintiff's allegation that the trial court's charge to the jury was confusing because it incorporated language of a Supreme Court opinion is without merit.

There is ample evidence to support the verdict and the trial court's instructions as to the law applicable to the evidence presented were thorough and fair.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

All concurred.


Summaries of

Kelly v. Bywater

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 26, 1969
171 N.W.2d 58 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

Kelly v. Bywater

Case Details

Full title:KELLY v. BYWATER

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 26, 1969

Citations

171 N.W.2d 58 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
171 N.W.2d 58