From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KAUR v. CHERTOFF

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 19, 2007
No. 07-CV-00525-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-CV-00525-GEB-DAD.

June 19, 2007

Robert B. Jobe (Cal. State Bar #133089), LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT B. JOBE, San Francisco, CA, Attorney for Plaintiffs.


ORDER


Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the time for filing the Defendants' answer to the complaint is extended until August 9, 2007 and the Joint Scheduling Conference, currently set for July 2, 2007, is rescheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on September 17, 2007. A joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen days prior to the scheduling conference.

The failure of one or more of the parties to participate in the preparation of the joint status report does not excuse the other parties from their obligation to timely file a status report in accordance with this Order. In the event a party fails to participate as ordered, the party timely submitting the status report shall include a declaration explaining why it was unable to obtain the cooperation of the other party or parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

KAUR v. CHERTOFF

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 19, 2007
No. 07-CV-00525-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2007)
Case details for

KAUR v. CHERTOFF

Case Details

Full title:MANJEET KAUR, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ET AL., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 19, 2007

Citations

No. 07-CV-00525-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2007)