From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kasem v. Morris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1997
244 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 24, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision denying that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for negligence and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs.

"It is a well-established principle that a simple breach of contract is not to be considered a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated" (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Is. R. R. Co., 70 N.Y.2d 382, 389; see also, Board of Educ. v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw Folley, 71 N.Y.2d 21, 29; Schiavone Constr. Co. v. Mayo Corp., 56 N.Y.2d 667, revg 81 A.D.2d 221, on dissenting opn of Silverman, J.; Suffolk Laundry Servs. v. Redux Corp., 238 A.D.2d 577; Key Int'l Mfg. v. Morse/Diesel, 142 A.D.2d 448, 451). The plaintiffs have not alleged that the defendant breached a legal duty independent of the contract ( see, Suffolk Laundry Servs. v. Redux Corp., supra; Burnell v. Morning Star Homes, 114 A.D.2d 657), and therefore their cause of action to recover damages for negligence should be dismissed.

With respect to the plaintiffs' cause of action sounding in breach of contract, we note that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover only for such incidental damages as flow directly from, and are the probable and natural result of, the breach ( see, Kenford Co. v. County of Erie, 73 N.Y.2d 312, 319; Uniform Commercial Code § 2-715), and for lost profits that are reasonably certain in amount and traceable with reasonable certainty to the breach ( see, Bibeau v. Ward, 228 A.D.2d 943; Manniello v Dea, 92 A.D.2d 426; Clearview Concrete Prods. Corp. v. S. Charles Gherardi, Inc., 88 A.D.2d 461; R I Elecs. v. Neuman, 66 A.D.2d 836; Robert T. Donaldson, Inc. v. Aggregate Surfacing Corp., 47 A.D.2d 852).

Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kasem v. Morris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1997
244 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Kasem v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:MAHER KASEM et al., Respondents, v. PHILIP MORRIS, USA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 469

Citing Cases

Xuchang Rihetai Human Hair Goods v. Hanyu International USA

A plaintiff is however, "entitled to recover only for such incidental damages as flow directly from, and are…

Xuchang Rihetai Human Hair Goods Co. v. Hanyu Intl. USA

A plaintiff is, however, "entitled to recover only for such incidental damages as flow directly from, and are…