Opinion
CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00246-JCM-PAL.
October 21, 2010
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, S. SCOTT GREENBERG, ESQ., Nevada Bar No. 4622, Las Vegas, Nevada, Attorneys for Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
On October 15, 2010, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed June 21, 2010 (Docket No. 42) came before the Court for oral argument. The motion was fully briefed as Plaintiff's opposition (Docket No. 48) was filed August 23, 2010, and Defendant's reply (Docket No. 50) was filed September 15, 2010. Present at the hearing where S. Scott Greenberg, Esq., counsel for Defendant, and Plaintiff and her counsel, Richard Segerblom, Esq. The Court previously granted Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5) requesting dismissal of the Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth claims asserted in the complaint. Docket No. 20. The remaining claims are the First (ADEA claim), Second (NRS Chapter 613 discrimination claim), Third (Title VII claim), and Sixth (Title VII retaliation claim).
The complaint does not contain an Eighth Claim for Relief.
Having considered the parties' briefs in support of and in opposition to the motion, and the arguments of counsel, S. Scott Greenberg, Esq. on behalf of Defendant and Richard Segerblom, Esq. on behalf of Plaintiff, the Court finds there are no genuine issues of material fact under any of the remaining claims for relief and Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)(2). Therefore, the Court grants the Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety and this matter is hereby dismissed.