From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Junior v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 16, 1999
763 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-1765.

Opinion filed June 16, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barry E. Goldstein, Judge; L.T. No. 97-132 CF10A.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Michael Junior challenges his dual convictions for strong armed robbery and grand theft on the ground that they violate his constitutional protection against double jeopardy under article I, section 9, of the Florida Constitution and the Fifth and Fourteen Amendments to the United States Constitution. We agree.

Appellant was charged, in a six count information, with burglary (Count I), kidnapping (Count II), sexual battery with great force (Count III), lewd and lascivious act upon an elderly person (Count IV), strong armed robbery (Count V), and grand theft (Count VI). The robbery and theft counts describe the same property insatisfying the statutory elements, i.e., "jewelry, and cash, good and lawful currency of the United States of America, and keys." The trial court adjudicated the appellant guilty of strong armed robbery and grand theft based on the taking of the same property.

We find that the dual convictions are contrary to our supreme court's holding in Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla. 1994). See § 775.021(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997). Additionally, grand theft is a lesser included offense of robbery. Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 295; Guinto v. State, 693 So.2d 46 (Fla.4th DCA 1997); Santos v. State, 644 So.2d 171 (Fla.4th DCA 1994) (conviction of robbery and grand theft erroneous under Sirmons).

Accordingly, we affirm the robbery conviction and vacate the grand theft conviction. Hardy v. State, 705 So.2d 979 (Fla.4th DCA 1998). However, because vacating the grand theft conviction will not affect appellant's sentence, there is no need to remand for resentencing. Santos.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Junior v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 16, 1999
763 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Junior v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JUNIOR, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 16, 1999

Citations

763 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Miller v. State

We agree with that concession. See Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla. 1994) (holding that convictions for…

McKinney v. State

Ingram, 928 So.2d at 1263 (citing Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 15.1 tbl.; Junior v. State, 763 So.2d 1056…