From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. LaSala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 1996
232 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 21, 1996.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, Frank P. Mangiatordi, the attorney for the plaintiff Judy Williams, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burrows, J.), entered August 8, 1995, which awarded counsel fees to Douglas Kaplan, the former attorney for the plaintiff, of 60% of a one-third contingency fee on a $40,000 settlement.

Before: Mangano, J.P., Rosenblatt, Sullivan and Hart, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the nonparty respondent.

Contrary to appellant's contention, we find no basis to conclude that the trial court improvidently exercised its discretion in fixing the counsel fees in this case ( see, Clifford v Pierce, 214 AD2d 697). The trial court was in the best position to weigh factors such as the time each lawyer spent on the case and the work performed ( see, Clifford v Pierce, supra; Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454; Wilson v Williams, 232 AD2d 552 [decided herewith]).


Summaries of

Williams v. LaSala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 1996
232 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Williams v. LaSala

Case Details

Full title:JUDY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. FRANCINE LASALA, Defendant, FRANK P…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 970

Citing Cases

Simas v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. We find no merit to the appellant's…

Wilson v. Williams

Contrary to appellant's contention, we find no basis to conclude that the trial court improvidently exercised…