From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Agnant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 24, 1999
262 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 24, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).


The motion was properly denied for failure to demonstrate how the three nonparty physicians identified by defendant as prospective witnesses would be inconvenienced by a trial in Bronx County. On a motion such as this, little, if any, consideration is to be given to the convenience of employees of defendant hospital ( see, Herrera v. St. Luke's/Roosevelt Hosp. Ctr., 224 A.D.2d 323; Barbot v. Nagabushana, 235 A.D.2d 289). In any event, the motion was untimely (CPLR 511 [a]; see, Schwarz v. Erpf Estate, 232 A.D.2d 316).

Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.


Summaries of

Joseph v. Agnant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 24, 1999
262 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Joseph v. Agnant

Case Details

Full title:LeMAR JOSEPH, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, MARLENE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
693 N.Y.S.2d 21