Opinion
June 24, 1999.
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).
The motion was properly denied for failure to demonstrate how the three nonparty physicians identified by defendant as prospective witnesses would be inconvenienced by a trial in Bronx County. On a motion such as this, little, if any, consideration is to be given to the convenience of employees of defendant hospital ( see, Herrera v. St. Luke's/Roosevelt Hosp. Ctr., 224 A.D.2d 323; Barbot v. Nagabushana, 235 A.D.2d 289). In any event, the motion was untimely (CPLR 511 [a]; see, Schwarz v. Erpf Estate, 232 A.D.2d 316).
Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.