From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barbot v. Nagabushana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1997
235 A.D.2d 289 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

January 21, 1997.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered July 8, 1996, which denied defendant's motion to change the venue of this medical malpractice action from Bronx County to Steuben County or Allegany County, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.


The motion, insofar as it is based on the convenience of material witnesses, was properly denied because it was initially unsupported by the identification of any nonparty witness who would be inconvenienced by travel to the Bronx ( see, Jansen v Bernhang, 149 AD2d 468, 469). This initial deficiency was not saved by statements made in defendant's reply papers ( see, Azzopardi v American Blower Corp., 192 AD2d 453, 454), which, in any event, identify as a witness who would be inconvenienced only an employee of his, whose convenience is given limited, if any, consideration ( see, Jansen v Bernhang, supra, at 470). Insofar as the motion was based on plaintiffs claimed nonresidence in Bronx County at the time the action was commenced, we agree with the IAS Court that defendant's "evidence" in this regard failed to satisfy his burden of proof. We have considered defendant's numerous related contentions and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

Barbot v. Nagabushana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1997
235 A.D.2d 289 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Barbot v. Nagabushana

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS M. BARBOT, Respondent, v. G. V. NAGABUSHANA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1997

Citations

235 A.D.2d 289 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
652 N.Y.S.2d 292

Citing Cases

Root v. Brotmann

Defendant's moving papers, seeking a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3), were deficient in virtually…

Marko v. Culinary Institute of America

nty (Harold Tompkins, J.). The motion, insofar as it sought a change of venue as of right, was properly…