From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JONES v. DEJA VU, INC.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jul 5, 2005
No. C 05-0997 BZ (N.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2005)

Opinion

No. C 05-0997 BZ.

July 5, 2005


ORDER ON JOINT MOTIONS TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS AGAINST VARIOUS DEFENDANTS BASED ON LACK OF ARTICLE III STANDING


Various defendants have moved to dismiss all of plaintiffs' claims based on lack of Article III standing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that to the extent defendants' motion addresses claims one through five, defendants have failed to establish that the owners of the Lusty Lady lack standing, and their motion is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent defendants' motion addresses claims six through nineteen, it is DENIED without prejudice to being renewed before the arbitrator. See June 30, 2005 Order on Motions of Defendants Chowder House, Inc. and Saw Entertainment, Ltd. to Compel Arbitration; July 1, 2005 Order With Respect to Roe 7.

The moving defendants include: San Francisco Roaring 20's LLC, San Francisco Garden of Eden LLC dba Garden of Eden, Gold Club — SF LLC dba Gold Club, Bijou Market LLC dba Market Street Cinema, Bijou Market LLC dba LA Gals, Bijou Century LLC dba New Century, BT California LLC dba Showgirls, and Déjà Vu Consulting, Inc. (hereinafter "defendants").

All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all proceedings including entry of final judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).


Summaries of

JONES v. DEJA VU, INC.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jul 5, 2005
No. C 05-0997 BZ (N.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2005)
Case details for

JONES v. DEJA VU, INC.

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY JONES, Plaintiff(s), v. DEJA VU, INC., et al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jul 5, 2005

Citations

No. C 05-0997 BZ (N.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2005)