finding that because an assistant vice president of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. had been authorized by a MERS corporate resolution to execute assignments on its behalf, she “had authority to assign mortgage on behalf of MERS as a matter of law pursuant to G.L. c. 183, § 54B”
Summary of this case from Wilson v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.No. 12–P–1957.
2013-12-6
Paul M. JONES v. BANK OF NEW YORK.
Judgment affirmed.
finding that because an assistant vice president of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. had been authorized by a MERS corporate resolution to execute assignments on its behalf, she “had authority to assign mortgage on behalf of MERS as a matter of law pursuant to G.L. c. 183, § 54B”
Summary of this case from Wilson v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.Full title:Paul M. JONES v. BANK OF NEW YORK.
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts.
Date published: Dec 6, 2013
Furthermore, the Massachusetts Appeals Court recently addressed Section 54B in two recent unpublished…
Jones v. Bank of N.Y.Moreover, claims related to the 2007 foreclosure appear to have been decided previously by a Massachusetts…