From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Bolar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 20, 2016
CIVIL ACTION 15-0252-WS-C (S.D. Ala. May. 20, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 15-0252-WS-C

05-20-2016

JONATHAN BISHOP, (AIS # 272754) Plaintiff, v. REGINA BOLAR, et al. Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff Jonathan Bishop recover nothing, and the claims made against Defendants Regina Bolar, William Gillis, Brian Ezell, and Kelly Smith are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of May, 2016.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bishop v. Bolar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 20, 2016
CIVIL ACTION 15-0252-WS-C (S.D. Ala. May. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Bishop v. Bolar

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN BISHOP, (AIS # 272754) Plaintiff, v. REGINA BOLAR, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 20, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 15-0252-WS-C (S.D. Ala. May. 20, 2016)

Citing Cases

Blackshear v. Smith

Plaintiff's testimony demonstrates that Defendant did not have subjective knowledge of the risk of serious…