Opinion
Nos. 05-04-00816-CR, 05-04-00817-CR, 05-04-00818-CR
Opinion issued January 24, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F04-49602-KN, F04-49603-HN, F03-52035-HN. Affirmed.
Before Justices WRIGHT, O'NEILL, and FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Danny Antonio Johnson was convicted of robbery, possession of cocaine in an amount less than one gram, and retaliation. The trial court assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment and a $10,000 fine in the robbery and possession of cocaine cases, and five years' imprisonment and a $1500 fine in the retaliation case. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgments.
Cause nos. 05-04-00816-CR and 05-04-00817-CR, the robbery and cocaine cases, involve new convictions. Cause no. 05-04-00818-CR, the retaliation case, involves a probation revocation.
Punishment in the cocaine case was enhanced by two prior state jail felonies to a third-degree felony. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 12.42(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2005).