From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Jan 17, 1990
786 S.W.2d 709 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 0733-86.

June 7, 1989. On Rehearing June 7, 1989. Rehearing Denied January 17, 1990.

Appeal from 334th Judicial District, Chambers County, Carroll E. Wilborn, Jr., J.

Benjamin F. Walker, San Antonio, for appellant.

Michael R. Little, Dist. Atty., and Georgia L. Clapper, Asst. Dist. Atty., Anahuac, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING


Our opinion on original submission is withdrawn.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated sexual assault. V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 22.021. His punishment was assessed by the jury at twenty years imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment of conviction. Johnson v. State, 709 S.W.2d 345 (Tex.App. — Houston (14th Dist.) 1986).

Pursuant to Rule 202(k), T.R.App.Proc. we dismiss appellant's petition for discretionary review as having been improvidently granted. As is true in every case, refusal or dismissal of a petition for discretionary review by this Court does not constitute an endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the court of appeals. See Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983), Campbell v. State, 647 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983).

Appellant's petition for discretionary review is dismissed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Jan 17, 1990
786 S.W.2d 709 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert Ralph JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Jan 17, 1990

Citations

786 S.W.2d 709 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Nash v. State

Nash did not object to the any of these verbal limiting instructions raising the grounds he now asserts on…

Ex Parte Bailey

Therefore, we conclude the State is not jeopardy barred from prosecuting appellant for committing the second,…