From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Mar 30, 1983
647 S.W.2d 660 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983)

Opinion

Nos. 107-83, 108-83.

March 30, 1983.

Appeal from the 26th Judicial District Court, Williamson County, William S. Lott, J.

Stephen M. Orr, Austin, for appellant.

Edward J. Walsh, Dist. Atty., and Edgar A. Nooning, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., Georgetown, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., and Alfred Walker, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.


OPINION ON APPELLANTS' PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


Appellants were convicted of the offense of aggravated robbery, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for 30 years. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Campbell v. State, 644 S.W.2d 154 (Tex.App. — Austin, 1982).

We agree with the Court of Appeals that Appellants' convictions should be affirmed. Accordingly, Appellants' petitions for discretionary review will be refused. As is true in every case, refusal of discretionary review by this Court does not constitute an endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals.

Appellants' petitions for discretionary review are refused.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of March, 1983.


Summaries of

Campbell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Mar 30, 1983
647 S.W.2d 660 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983)
Case details for

Campbell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Linda CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee, and Homer Clifton…

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Mar 30, 1983

Citations

647 S.W.2d 660 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

State v. Villanueva

Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813, 814 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) ("The Bench and Bar of the State should not…

Sheffield v. State

The Bench and Bar of the State should not assume that the summary refusal of a petition for discretionary…