From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Phillips

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 20, 1977
345 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Summary

In Johnson v. Phillips, 345 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 358 So.2d 131 (Fla. 1978), we affirmed a finding of permanency based upon somewhat similar evidence.

Summary of this case from Ketchen v. Dunn

Opinion

No. 76-398.

May 20, 1977.

Appeal from the Polk County Circuit Court, Gunter Stephenson, J.

A.J. Melkus, Lakeland, for appellants.

Eugene W. Harris, Peterson, Carr, Harris Seacrest, Lakeland, for appellees Phillips.

Edward E. Fessenden, Jr., Lane, Massey, Trohn, Clarke, Bertrand Smith, Lakeland, for appellee Auto Owners Ins. Co.


The only point on this appeal and cross appeal which merits discussion is whether or not the appellee, Mary Phillips, crossed the threshold requirement provided for in Florida Statute 627.737(2).

Appellants contend that Mrs. Phillips did not prove within a reasonable medical probability that she suffered a permanent injury. In support of this contention appellants rely on Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc. v. Stuart, 301 So.2d 29 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). In that case this court held that the injured party did not have a permanent injury, although at the time of trial he was still experiencing pain in his lower back, tightness in his upper back, a certain amount of limitation of motion of his right arm, and could not lift objects which prior to the accident he was capable of lifting. This was held to be insufficient proof of permanent injury because the only medical testimony was that the injured party had no permanent injury. There was no medical testimony that the subjective complaint, i.e., pain, was permanent.

The medical testimony in the instant case shows that Mrs. Phillips was suffering from a post-concussion syndrome or post-traumatic syndrome. The symptoms of such syndromes are headaches and dizziness. Dr. Taxdal, a Neurosurgeon, was asked these questions and gave these answers:

"Q And at this time now that we have had two successive normal electroencephalogram tests, your position is that the injury is not permanent but the complaints may well be permanent, the subjective complaints.

A Yes, I am so stating that.

Q Doctor, just so that there is no question when you say you are so stating that, you are stating with an opinion based upon reasonable medical probability that this patient does not in fact have a permanent injury. Is that correct?

A I have stated that within reasonable medical certainty I feel the patient's complaints are permanent. I have further stated for clarification I do not feel she has permanent injury of an organic nature that I can see."

It is clear from Dr. Taxdal's testimony that in his opinion to have a permanent injury it must be of an organic nature or what is sometimes called "objective findings."

Mrs. Phillips' initial injury was of an organic nature, to wit, a brain concussion. This organic injury resulted in "permanent injury" albeit it manifests itself through subjective complaints of pain, which complaints, according to the medical testimony, are permanent.

We interpret the words "permanent injury" in Florida Statute 627.737(2) to include permanent subjective complaints of pain resulting from an initial organic injury. Therefore, we hold that Mrs. Phillips crossed the threshold requirements of Florida Statute 627.737(2) and affirm the judgments appealed.

McNULTY and SCHEB, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Phillips

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 20, 1977
345 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

In Johnson v. Phillips, 345 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 358 So.2d 131 (Fla. 1978), we affirmed a finding of permanency based upon somewhat similar evidence.

Summary of this case from Ketchen v. Dunn

In Johnson, we held that an organic injury can result in permanent injury that manifests itself through subjective complaints of pain.

Summary of this case from Ketchen v. Dunn
Case details for

Johnson v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:MARY LEWIS JOHNSON AND PREFERRED RISK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 20, 1977

Citations

345 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. Handy

Ms. Robinson's claim that she did not have a diagnosis that her injuries were "permanent" as defined by the…

Rivero v. Mansfield

According to the Riveros' medical experts' testimony, Rosa's permanent pain constituted a permanent injury;…