Opinion
January 29, 1973
In an action in which a judgment was entered granting plaintiff a divorce from appellant, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated February 11, 1972, which (a) granted plaintiff's motion to adjudge appellant in contempt for failure to comply with the child support provisions of the judgment, fining him in the amount of $2,560, and (b) granted plaintiff a counsel fee of $150. Order reversed, without costs, and motion remanded to Special Term for (1) a hearing de novo on the question of the effectiveness of sequestration of appellant's property pursuant to section 245 Dom. Rel. of the Domestic Relations Law and (2) a new determination. In our opinion, there was a failure to comply with section 245 Dom. Rel. of the Domestic Relations Law. The record lacks a showing that the court was presumptively satisfied that sequestration would be ineffectual ( Spargo v. Spargo, 25 A.D.2d 612). Since contempt proceedings were brought without having complied with the clear statutory predicate of first seeking sequestration, there should have been no award of counsel fees ( Zellermayer v. Zellermayer, 36 A.D.2d 636). On the hearing de novo Special Term should consider the principles annunciated in Matter of Roe v. Doe ( 29 N.Y.2d 188). Munder, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.