From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jeter v. Harris

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division
Jun 19, 2007
C/A No. 0:07-00857-GRA-BM (D.S.C. Jun. 19, 2007)

Summary

dismissing the case against the Lexington County (South Carolina) Department of Social Services

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Herrick

Opinion

C/A No. 0:07-00857-GRA-BM.

June 19, 2007


ORDER Written Opinion


This matter comes before the Court for review of the magistrate's Report and Recommendation made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2)(d), D.S.C., and filed on May 15, 2007. Plaintiff filed this action on March 30, 2007 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The magistrate recommends dismissing Defendants Lexington County Department of Social Services and Lexington County Family Court Judge K. Allen as party Defendants.

Plaintiff brings this claim pro se. This Court is required to construe pro se pleadings liberally. Such pleadings are held to a less stringent standard than those drafted by attorneys. Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147, 1151 (4th Cir. 1978). This Court is charged with liberally construing a pleading filed by a pro se litigant to allow for the development of a potentially meritorious claim. Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982).

The magistrate makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). This Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and this Court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court may also "receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate with instructions." Id. In the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th. Cir. 1983). Plaintiff has filed no objections.

After a review of the record, this Court finds that the magistrate's Report and Recommendation accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted in its entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case be DISMISSED as to Defendants Lexington County Department of Social Services and Lexington County Family Court Judge K. Allen without prejudice and without issuance and service of process for these Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

Plaintiff has the right to appeal this Order within thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of this Order, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Failure to meet this deadline, as modified by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, will waive the right to appeal.


Summaries of

Jeter v. Harris

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division
Jun 19, 2007
C/A No. 0:07-00857-GRA-BM (D.S.C. Jun. 19, 2007)

dismissing the case against the Lexington County (South Carolina) Department of Social Services

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Herrick
Case details for

Jeter v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:Eric David Jeter, #50260 formerly #288299, Plaintiff, v. Major James E…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division

Date published: Jun 19, 2007

Citations

C/A No. 0:07-00857-GRA-BM (D.S.C. Jun. 19, 2007)

Citing Cases

Woods v. S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs.

It is well established that DSS, as an arm of the state, is immune from a suit for damages under the Eleventh…

Nelson v. Herrick

Id. at *6. The District of South Carolina reached the same conclusion at the motion to dismiss stage in Jeter…