From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jerome v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division
Mar 16, 2010
CV-09-20-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Mar. 16, 2010)

Opinion

CV-09-20-GF-SEH.

March 16, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Application for Award of EAJA Fees and Costs. The request arises directly from this Court's adoption of Magistrate Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and remanding the case to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The motion is opposed.

The United States prevailed in proceedings before the Commissioner. When additional medical records, not available to the ALJ prior to his decision were produced, remand was ordered to ensure full consideration of Plaintiff's claim. Plaintiff has not prevailed on the merits of her claim. In the end she may or may not be entitled to benefits.

The Court declines to conclude the defendant's position in defending the claim to have been unreasonable in law or in fact. It has been to this point substantially justified. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A).

In the absence of any final judgment on the merits, and as the record now stands, an award of attorney's fees would be premature. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B).

ORDERED

Plaintiff's Application for Award of EAJA Fees and Costs is DENIED without prejudice to renewal if plaintiff prevails on the merits of her claim.

Doc. No. 25.


Summaries of

Jerome v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division
Mar 16, 2010
CV-09-20-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Mar. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Jerome v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WENDY J. JEROME, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division

Date published: Mar 16, 2010

Citations

CV-09-20-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Mar. 16, 2010)