From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jensen v. Premo

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Dec 14, 2016
282 Or. App. 905 (Or. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

A158134

12-14-2016

Joel JENSEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Defendant-Respondent.

Jed Peterson and O'Connor Weber LLP filed the opening brief for appellant. Joel Jensen filed the supplemental brief pro se. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Rebecca M. Auten, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Jed Peterson and O'Connor Weber LLP filed the opening brief for appellant. Joel Jensen filed the supplemental brief pro se.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Rebecca M. Auten, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Lagesen, Judge.

PER CURIAMIn this post-conviction appeal, petitioner challenges the denial of his petition for relief. We reject his first assignment of error without written discussion, writing only to address petitioner's remaining assignment in which he asserts that the form of the post-conviction judgment did not comply with ORS 138.640(1), as construed in Datt v. Hill , 347 Or. 672, 227 P.3d 714 (2010). Defendant concedes that the judgment was not Datt compliant, namely because the judgment does not clearly state the legal basis for the post-conviction court's denial of petitioner's claims for relief. See Soderstrom v. Premo , 274 Or.App. 624, 629, 360 P.3d 1272 (2015), rev. den. , 358 Or. 550, 368 P.3d 25 (2016) (concluding that "the judgment's reference to the state's trial memorandum does not render it compliant with Datt "). We agree and accept defendant's concession. Consequently, we reverse and remand for the court to enter a new judgment that complies with ORS 138.640(1).

Additionally, we reject without written discussion defendant's contentions raised in his pro se supplemental brief.
--------

Reversed and remanded for entry of judgment including the findings required by ORS 138.640(1).


Summaries of

Jensen v. Premo

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Dec 14, 2016
282 Or. App. 905 (Or. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Jensen v. Premo

Case Details

Full title:Joel JENSEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Dec 14, 2016

Citations

282 Or. App. 905 (Or. Ct. App. 2016)
385 P.3d 1276

Citing Cases

Jensen v. Premo

Jensen v. Premo, 282 Or.App. 905, 385 P.3d 1276 …