From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaladian v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 24, 2009
No. CIV S-07-1930 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1930 JAM DAD P.

November 24, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 28, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. The parties have filed objections to the findings and recommendations and petitioner has also filed a reply to respondents' objections.

On September 9, 2009, counsel Jilbert Tahmazian filed a document styled, "Designation of Counsel" in which he substitutes as counsel for petitioner.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 28, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. Respondents' November 20, 2008 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 15) is denied; and

3. Respondents are ordered to file their answer within sixty days from the service of this order.


Summaries of

Jaladian v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 24, 2009
No. CIV S-07-1930 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Jaladian v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:VAHAN JALADIAN, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 24, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1930 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2009)